Politics & Government

Special Elections Scheduled for March in San Diego

Two special elections were schedule for March 12 to fill San Diego City Council Tony Young and Rep. Juan Vargas seats.

Two special elections to fill the state Senate seat of Rep. Juan Vargas, D-San Diego, and the City Council seat vacated by Tony Young, were scheduled Monday for March.   

Vargas gave up his Senate seat after he won an election to replace 10-term Congressman Bob Filner, San Diego's new mayor.   

Gov. Jerry Brown scheduled a special election to fill his seat for March 12. If necessary, a runoff would be held on May 14.   

Find out what's happening in La Jollawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The City Council set its special election for March 26, deciding against holding the election on the same day. Doing so would have saved about $100,000 of the estimated $385,000 needed to hold a special election, but March 12 would not give candidates for the District 4 seat a full two weeks to collect the required 100 nominating signatures, City Clerk Elizabeth Maland said.   

If no candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote, a runoff would be held within seven weeks of the March 26 vote.   

Find out what's happening in La Jollawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Young, who was council president for two years, resigned Jan. 2 to become CEO of the San Diego and Imperial Counties Chapter of the American Red Cross.   

He left office just after new district boundaries took effect. But because he was re-elected in 2010, the District 4 boundary at that time will determine who gets to choose his successor.   

Votes in neighborhoods new to the district, like Redwood Village and Rolando Park, protested that they would be “disenfranchised” by not being allowed to vote on Young's successor.   

Deputy City Attorney Sharon Spivak told the council that the state Supreme Court has ruled that those who put someone in office should determine a successor, and that the city lost a court battle over a similar issue in 1991.   

“It's somewhat confusing and maybe it doesn't make common sense on some levels but the law is the law, and we're required to follow it,” Councilman Kevin Faulconer said.  

Council President Todd Gloria said the legal precedent was “disappointing,” because some voters will be able to choose a candidate who will never represent them.

—City News Service


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here